[quote=Senor Herp]
M-maybe we could not quibble about unsure freeform pseudo-gamey 'balancing' acts regarding so-and-so's invulnerability or non-invulnerability, without any objective point of 'this is entirely rational/irrational and can't be dissented against' to work from, and think about, y'know, how so-and-so aspect suits and advances the narrative in a compelling fashion. Yes? Maybe? N-no?[size=nope]please[/qqcodeashit]
[/quote]

Let's go with Herp said. He sounds smart. Right herp?