I tend to be in advanced more often than any other forum. I don't have any major specialisms but I guess I'm interested in RP 'theory'. I've mentioned in the B!tching thread how I have a preference for players to be aware of OoC knowledge in order to better prepare plot developments and work out character arcs. While I don't say this is a better way of doing it necessarily (if I remember, you were a proponent of being truer to character and reacting to events as they unfold), it might be interesting to discuss different interpretations of 'how to' for players and GM's.

I also, on an old account I can't access any more, wrote [url=http://www.roleplayerguild.com/topics/7841/posts/ooc]this[/url] which I've been meaning to update a little bit, but I think is, on the whole, a decent guide. I'd be quite happy to have its content included in this project when I get round to updating it.

A couple of questions:
1) the simple one - what is a wikidot? Does it actually look like a wikipedia page?
2) the harder one - how do you vet content admission? If somebody ventures an opinion that is almost universally accepted as 'wrong' ([i]"It's always easier to just control other player's characters if they don't do what you you want them to,"[/i] for example), does that opinion get into the universal guide?