[b]@Dinh AaronMK:[/b] I fully agree, with an amendment. If a morality system (or similar) is used, it should be less good versus evil, more pragmatic survivalist versus charismatic idealist. The pragmatic survivalist might not want to leave people to die, but will do it to accomplish an objective or save the majority. The charismatic idealist will try to save innocent lives, even if it costs the lives of some of their men or even themselves in the process. It also makes an in-between state not only relevant, but perfectly reasonable, and better reflects the outlook of human beings between individualism and collectivism, between self and community, and then deciding from there if those actions are motivated by a sense of righteousness, arrogance, or simple necessity.