[quote=Ellri]
What Sep said. Those pants hanging like that leave you terribly vulnerable in combat. There's a reason that when not going with full body armor, people have always gone for protecting the torso. There's all sorts of organs inside it you would find rather inconvenient to get damaged. Not to mention, the torso is a big target that is easy to hit, no matter what your weapon is. Its only in Hollywood movies that you don't get hit in the torso if its insufficiently protected.If you're going with the appearance being "femme fatale", then having the appearance being androgynous is a contradiction. The character could still be androgynous beneath the clothes, but the definition of "femme fatale" is "an attractive and seductive woman, especially one who will ultimately cause distress to a man who becomes involved with her." As such, looking androgynous is a contradiction. We have some other comments, but not posting them yet as we're gonna discuss that with you Alida/Barks in the PM convo.
[/quote]

its the duality of the appearance. Not quite a contradiction at all. The question is in the perception of others, rather than of its creator. My goal for the character is to be androgynous, however another character may perceive the same character as a femme fatale which is also part of the goal of the design is to make such a suggestion yet leave nothing more than it. Similarly with respect for the need for armor, I hardly doubt Morgan would be in for open combat, too many variables to contend with. Regardless I suppose we can make any altercations required, please feel free to ask away.