[quote=Darcs]
Booooooooriiiiiiiing! 
[/quote]
Firstly Lets keep this civil and not discriminate others because of their beliefs 
[quote=Darcs]
That will only realistically happen at a town or city level though. When an entire public IS individuals that you distinguish and see, 'murca's too big to ever benefit the entire public. Why shouldn't religion and politics be separate? What about the whole issue of having your citizens essentially becoming debt slaves to a declining imaginary fiat currency based off of a paper fiat currency based off of nothing?I agree that people SHOULD be able to have whatever gunz they want, but why the hell does anyone need a machine gun? I like the idea of cities having their own personal weapon statues.That's really all anyone can ask.That's a slippery slope. What is the scientific measure of "particularly-addictive-drugs-that-render-people-dysfunctional-beyond-reason-need-to-be-controlled" drugs? Neurochemistry, like DNA, is always different, and how people respond to drugs relies on that, environmental factors, personal experiences and opinions, and more chemical and psychological stimuli. Someone's 'meth' could be another person's 'pot' and vice versa-- and this isn't even counting the millions of people with addictions to actions and substances you wouldn't even consider "drugs." You can't cherry pick which drugs are okay, and which drugs aren't. Give adults the options to try whatever it is they want to try and trust that they won't all become addicts.(DMT is pretty great though, I don't see a problem if literally everyone in America was addicted to it, hue hue hue)Why?
[/quote]

I agree with your points, however I am curious as to what you describe yourself as
[quote=darkwolf687]
As for the police, of course. Thats what they are there for, to ensure you do not break the social contract you sign by living in the country, and to help uphold the Crowns end of the agreement
[/quote]

Of that is the polices job then why do we need a monarch to get "protection"?[quote=darkwolf687]
As for the monarch, well, what have the children of the rich, or even the children of the first world, done but pop out of the right vagina? 
[/quote]

Thats why we must have a inheritance tax, children of the privileged should not have to rest on their parents laurels while the children of the less privileged must work hard

[quote=darkwolf687]
Its silly to pretend that the children of the rich arent in a position of power and advantage by luck alone, and that the children of the first world arent at an advantage by luck alone. Luck, I suppose, played a part to be born with this specific genetic pattern, decided by factors outside out control, in a place outside our control, to people and circumstances outside our control. Some are more lucky than others.
[/quote]
What else is it but luck? And what a silly thing to decide who gets to be privileged in society and who is not
[quote=darkwolf687]
Besides, the British Royal Fanily have done a lot for my country since they first took the throne. The House of Windsor has won my respect for what they've done.
[/quote]
Oh? Do tell me what the Monarchy has done that is not because of pressure from the progressiveness that is society or something that could not have been done if we did not have the crown[quote=Revolutionary]
Also, to clarify on one of my views, the church should not be forced to do homosexual marriages. Churches should have that right to choose if they want to, or the state should do homosexual marriages one.
[/quote]

Out of curiosity do you think the Church itself should decide their policy or should it be left to the indivdual pastor/priest/bishop/iman?