[quote=Xilaw]
[quote=Enalais]
It works because i think the odds can be played a bit. A man far greater than i said "Never tell me the odds."
[/quote]

Alright then. I'll let you in if the leader of the peasants is of gentle birth. Perhaps an unsatisfied knight that rose his village against the state etc. Deal? This way you can be considered somewhat of a noble house and still have your smelly villagers.

By the way guys, in the spirit of the Roleplay, When it comes to PvP, how do you think it should be done? I was thinking the two sides figure it out together through PM (the outcome, the losses etc.) and then both post their view of the battle but with the same outcome and losses so it doesn't cause confusion.

As for PvE battles, I think the one that leads our armies should deal with the outcome and losses on their own. But I'd urge you to be objective when it comes to losses as I don't want to see people constantly killing off their rivals from other noble houses. For example, if two houses are at feud but are forced to fight together against a common enemy and I appointed one of them the leader of the combined forces.
[/quote]

Tis was my plan the entire time sir!