[quote=@Dedonus]
[quote=@Eru Iluvatar]
Alright. So you're saying minimal exposition is allowed, but it's necessary to be particularly vague for the foreseeable future?
[/quote]
I mean, I think we should take into consideration how popular some character are to determined how much we can use.  For instance, Iron Man is pretty popular (especially because of his movies/Marvel animated series).  For him, I would say don't mention him unless absolutely necessary because I assume someone, sooner or later, would like to pick him up.  However, for characters like the Inhumans, [b]unless others here are against it[/b], I would not mind if you took liberties with the other Inhumans.  My logic behind this is that I assume that a potential player would prefer to play as Iron Man over one of the other characters from the Inhumans.

Also, if worse comes to worse, we can just retcon stuff (especially if someone goes AWL).  That's the unfortunate side affect of using established Marvel characters over original characters (as can be seen in the [url=http://www.roleplayerguild.com/topics/135-create-a-hero-rpg/ooc]Create-A-Hero RPG[/url]).  Unfortunately here we are going to have to retcon if someone goes missing, while in the Create-A-Hero RPG, we could just ignore the posts of people who pop in, make a post or two, and then disappear.

Edit: Ops, forgot that New Yorker has thoughts about Black Bolt.  Well, if you would like to take liberties with the other Inhumans, you could run them by New Yorker just in case.
[/quote]

Well, as I said: Black Bolt is a huge part of Karnak's world. It would be arrogant of me to say that Eru can't use him an describe him in a way as to expose something about his own character. I see no issue in that at all. As a player, I would have to go into the CS under the assumptions that have already been expressed by Eru. Which I think brings the conversation full circle :D