[quote=@Dedonus]
[quote=@The New Yorker]
[b]Player Name:[/b] The New Yorker
[b]Character Name:[/b] Blackagar Boltagon 
[b]Moral Alignment:[/b] Hero
[b]Affiliations:[/b] The Inhumans
[/quote]
Black Bolt is accepted.
[/quote]

Good to hear! It should be noted that the Gambit storyline will be on a short hiatus while Rogue's storyline reaches a confluence with the former's. When that happens I imagine there will be a volley of collab's following. While we wait I decided to bring out Black Bolt to fill the void. I expect a few of my characters will have hiatus' like this, which I'm thankful for, but which also compels me to present one more character. I'm fairly confident that I can handle one more, but if anyone objects, I'd have to consider that, if at least for the efficacy of the RP. 

Barring objections, however, I'm considering a Baron Zemo CS. There is not a single PC villain character, and I think Zemo will be a really good universal enemy; enough that he can sufficiently fill in that gap, that is. Now that I've gotten DD & BB out of the way, I can clearly see what path I want for Zemo to take. It is, however, a little overarching, which is why I'd need to hash things out with Dedonus. 

I'm thinking that the free-form nature of the RP lends to the concept of vastly different yet potent arcs induced primarily by the PC's actions and the player's imagination. And what I mean by that is: players can cause momentous shifts in occurrences (canonical arcs) within this universe on a whim, as long as it's partnered by sufficient excuse. 

This kinda ties in with the other conversation we were having earlier. Primarily in the context of "how much power do players have", I suppose. Let me know if I'm not making sense or if you need clarification. Be aware, however, that I don't intend to outline what I have in store for Baron Zemo until I'm allowed to present a CS.