[quote=@mdk]
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

I don't think 'the gay gene' would be useless at all, or at least, not any more useless than any other gene. But what's interesting about it is, the gay gene [i]selects itself for omission[/i] in sexual reproduction. That is a very high evolutionary hill to climb. 
[/quote]

[url=http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051088&representation=PDF]Apparently, it's been linked to sex drive in women[/url], for homosexual men at least; apparently there's a higher rate of reproduction among the female relatives of gay men according to a study in Italy. I didn't go nailing down the study's sources or trying to figure out any of the science behind it because, quite frankly, that's not my job and I don't have all the free time in the world to worry about it. :newlol