[@Blue Demon] It's kind of funny, when you get into that particular stuff. Because it can always get into the weeds. Sort of a slippery slope, or denying one and accepting the other. Kind of thing. If you actually want me to explain that I can. <.< 

But in general, though it's a very, very small minority, and it's very likely environmental persuasion. Yes, people who are "straight" but are also asexual. Exist. It's only "weird" because it's not a common thing. I don't think there's anything wrong with basically being the direct opposite of a sexually desperate individual.

As [@Gray Linings] said, you can find someone attractive and maybe desire a closer connection, but the act of sex itself doesn't seem remotely appealing. I frankly think relationships in general are a little too reliant on how damn horny people are, and it doesn't surprise me that practically all romantic relationships are completely frail and eventually die.

Now you give yourself the term sexually repulsed, but I don't think I'd use that as a blanket statement for asexuality in general, but maybe I'm wrong, and maybe your saying that personally. But my question for you, if you'd be willing to answer it. (hopefully not too personal) If you had a significant other, and you cared for them enough, would you have sex with them if they asked you? It's basically doing things you don't like, to please the ones you love. Or would you still refuse?