[quote=@Pepperm1nts]
You came waltzing in and pretty much stole every-fucking-thing about my idea. I don't care if it was intentional or not, but you did. Exactly the same armament, same role, same experimental status. Even the words you used to describe its role were the same. Hell, you even downgraded your ship to a frigate, as if it wasn't already similar enough to mine. No, you had to make it the same ship type too. What am I supposed to do? Sit here and just let you take my idea?

You have not taken a thing Gorgenmast has said without trying to argue against it, and [i]I'm[/i] the stubborn one? I'm trying to keep you from waltzing in and just depriving me of my role in the RP. And don't get me wrong, I hate that I have to whine. I really do - I'd rather not. But I have to because the alternative is just sitting here and letting you fuck me over. So no, I'm not doing that. Sorry.

I am trying to make a compromise and you keep evading it. So don't call me fucking stubborn.

And for the record, my ship would still have stealth capabilities, just not Vorqhul in origin. So its submarine-like role would still be a thing.

EDIT: I had a point before and I still do. You just keep evading it because you don't want to compromise. But yeah, I'm the stubborn one.
[/quote]You may wish to read things over, man. Your memory seems to have some very convenient holes in it.
Yeah, you stick to the idea that nobody else should have spinal mounted weapons because you do. Real flexible.
Mind the fact I was the only one offering an alternative. You just asked the GM to keep the spinal gun rather than the stealth when you couldn't have both because you want the former more.

And then:
[quote]And for the record, my ship would still have stealth capabilities, just not Vorqhul in origin. So its submarine-like role would still be a thing.[/quote]Made an ass out of yourself and went back on even that.
Seriously, you won't help your case at all.
I don't wish to trample on your feelings but if anyone lacks sense of cooperation, it's you.