[@MissCapnCrunch] I.. I'm not sure if I can reach .. 1 paragraph...

I'm kidding. I'll write as I see fit then, thank you.

As per your IC post, when the king mentions sons, he means 'sons of the lords' right? As in, Tybalt can't contend in the name of the Gully family? Since pretty much every son of the lord is either a) too busy being a bastard or b) sailing the ocean or otherwise c) being ineligible, and probably too busy guarding the king. Ultimately it's up to Lord Gully, but either of which, sending out a real son might be a bit of trouble for him?

What say you [@Pundii]?