[quote=@ONL]
[@Dinh AaronMk] I know, well I do now after having read about him. But the issue was that according to his nation sheet, Browder was the leader of the soscialist forces that he defeated, while he was supposed to be the leader of your nation, creating a time-paradix that threathened to rip the entire universe apart :p [/quote]

To be honest, an almost-time-paradox isn't the worst thing going on in that application. Namely in part that FDR somehow got shoehorned into a pseudo-fascist state despite honestly being a lot closer to a socialist in the timely high-minded liberal American aristocrat sense. He wouldn't really fit in that area; he being a prominent New Yorker be damned.

Not to mention Republicans during this era were very against the idea of a large army and mass mobilization which'd be the very anti-national-socialist position.

Honestly, though he's only 35 at this point Charles Lindbergh would be a better choice for FDR's position that FDR. His wife would bust a vein if she knew who he was associating with, and she'd know sure as hell who he's associating with now.

[quote]
I'm afraid, vedy afraid that everyone of you wants a piece of my lovely Pacific...God help me...
[/quote]

I think most people have more to worry about from the Dust Bowl than anarcho-commies.

[img]http://www.miamisci.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/dust-bowl-1.png[/img]

And now there's no National Weather Service to tell anyone these are on their way, even though no one really cared except when the big ones hit the east. Twice.