[quote=@HarbingerKurahi]
[@MelonHead]

So. i'm not familiar with T-1 Eden as that was something that was never mentioned nor used in my time rp'ing. The closest aproximation to that I have is T-1 Royal and even then this character is legal there. My characters abilities have been looked over by several T-1 judges and approved by all of them. My character operates under certain restraints and restrictions via the rules of T-1 that I'm familiar with. If I were to use him without those restraints there would literally be nothing short of a god that could stop him. I fail to see how my characters abilities are not understandable or clear cut.
[/quote]

They're perfectly understandable, they're just disallowed by T1 Eden rules, and most tournament rules I've seen. You can't have abilities with descriptions like 'destroy anything it touches' because the ability can't be interacted with, it shits on whatever it hits if the description is to be taken at face value. If it's just fluff, it should be clearly stated that isn't its actual intended effect. Eden is supposed to go some of the way in regards to balancing out generalised and poorly worded abilities, but absolutes and force hits are still banned in this form of combat. (to explain further, the force hit in this instance is in regards to the effect of the lightning, though it could probably be dodged (somehow, as actual lightning is pretty much as fast as things get, being light and all) it is written to destroy -anything- it touches, which leaves no room for an opponent to mitigate damage if the description is to be accepted.)

Point being, if your abilities aren't actually absolute they're written badly, if they are they're banned by T1 Eden (and most other rulesets) rules. I'm sure plenty of people will still fight you and just ignore the intended effects you've written, but it would be disallowed in most proper tournaments. I assumed you were looking for insight into how the sheet would fare in regards to rulings here and places like here, I can't say I particularly care that other judges have decided the CS provides sufficient information, I can see it does not.

Feel free to heed my advice or ignore it, it makes little odds to me.