[url=http://thefederalist.com/2017/03/21/research-problems-unravel-liberal-narrative-alleging-everyone-racist/]Hmm...[/url]

Well, reading most of this discussion. It basically boils down to everyone is racist, but if that's true...why is merely saying it so damning and condemning of a man's/woman's character if literally everyone on earth is racist? How can it hold such power, if it's such a vague and almost pointless thing to say? Since from birth, you're just born that way...It's not just prejudice or ignorance, which are words that already exists. No, it's believing that a particular race is superior to another. The definition on google. I just really don't hold that belief...at all.

And really, what else is this but an attack on someone in the spotlight? I think the fact that an apology and explanation can change people's minds that fast on if that person is racist or not, shows how flimsy/inaccurate that word really is...also shows how uninformed people should really not make assumptions before they even have all the evidence in their lap. But everyone does it anyway...

[@Vilageidiotx] "I don't personally think that being against illegal immigration is an evil thing btw. I think it's a completely debatable subject that's been made stupid in the general discussion because both sides want to use it to gain political points." 

Is it really debatable though? Illegal immigration means crime has already been committed. Are we arguing for crime to become okay? Because that's really about all that can be debated. The reason the other side doesn't use that word is so people don't question the whole "illegal" thing. Not to nitpick, that is sort of what I'm doing. But I just don't feel like going full course. I'm politic'd out. :P