[quote=whizzball1]
Life cannot come from non-life. It is a scientific law which has never been disproved. All experiments trying to show that life could have come from non-life, first of all, came up with left-handed and right-handed amino acids, while it's only one type to make proteins. Besides that, if life were to somehow form when lightning struck and created uncountable amino acids that formed into uncountable proteins that all just formed together to make a cell, the leftover amino acids would be poisonous to the organism. Besides that, the environment it was in would also be poisonous to the new organism, for certain atmospheric reasons. Even worse, the experiments were specifically fixed to create these amino acids, and the environment fixed was different from the environment according to the theory.Cambrian Explosion: Before the Cambrian explosion, we only see rare scattered marine organisms throughout the fossil record. Suddenly, in the layers of the Cambrian Explosion, we get an explosion of new, complex life, in a far evolutionary stage from what we see before the explosion. As it seems, evolution had a sudden growth spurt during this short period. After the Cambrian Explosion, we go back to rare fossils that don't seem to show an evolutionary process. The Cambrian Explosion could be far better explained by a worldwide flood mass-killing sea, air, and land creatures, burying them in sediments quickly with the rushing water and then fossilising them just as quickly.
[/quote]

Coupled with the fact that the chances of one protein forming randomly are roughly the same as a blind man wandering through the Sahara for two years, and picking up a specific grain of sand, marked before the two year period, this occurring three times in a row. And that is only for one protein, not the sixteen necessary for basic life.