[quote=DarkwolfX37]
Not trying to start a fight, but:"Teaching" can be simply giving reasons why someone personally feels it's a good or bad idea."Demonic" does not necessarily mean "bad" or even "against god" (who, as a deity, is a demon) so to use that word is to misunderstand it's meaning to some degree.If god has a will for ___ as David suggests, then how do you know that someone teaching not to marry is against that?You've previously implied that (at least) all non human action events are controlled by god to further his plans, so why would someone teaching a conclusion they have found be "demonic"?I get the whole "knowledge is sin" thing but giving more information to someone from which to make a decision should not be considered "demonic" or "bad" by any means.To imply that teaching ____ is against god is to imply that the world he created is against god and to imply that teaching anything at all is against god, or (at minimum) anything that is not "objectively" (by which I mean not disputed by denominations) what god taught (preferably as Yeshua and not as YHVH) is "demonic", which would include the whole of human knowledge.Again, not trying to start a fight, just trying to see how you could logically think that spreading information could be "demonic".
[/quote]

You know, I don't even feel compelled to argue. I totally emptied my debate yanks, and I feel great.