I really, really want to argue about the merit of the "High-Casual" level/difficulty-notation, but that isn't the purpose of this thread so I won't.

What I will say, however, is that if you want to specify intra-level - i.e. "High-Casual", "Low-Advanced", etc. - it's better to scale up, so to speak. Low-Advanced being below typical Advanced quality defeats the point of Advanced - to draw a [i]bottom line[/i] for Advanced standard. The way the sections are defined are by their minimum requirements - and so by using "High-Casual", you aren't much affecting the definition of what is [i]required[/i] for an RP to be "Casual" level, but by using "Low-Advanced" you're completely breaking the point of the Advanced forum by violating that "bottom line", or the cut-off point, and changing the requirements for Advanced.