[quote=Halo]
Fire is my OTP, it's true. I ache with the desire to serenade the Springfield Tyre Fire long into the night.People from the IntChk will hopefully filter in over the next day or two, too. ^^Slower in what way? I thought it was fairly high-octane-action-packed, myself. I thought Spiderman was a little... contrived. The villains weren't very well-developed, though I did enjoy it immensely. The ending freaking killed me, too (not going to give away spoilers for the heretics who haven't seen it yet! xD)
[/quote]

Well, slower in that it was much more plot and character focused than I anticipated. And I don't mean to say that as a negative, I'm just used to the bigger scope the X-Men films usually go for. It was still very enjoyable, but I was expecting a bit more action I suppose? And I'm probably the only guy who thought Wolverine was woefully underused as Wolverine has been my favorite since the comics lol. 

As for Spider-Man, I truly don't understand some of the criticism. The villains were not very developed for sure, but I saw it as a setup for the eventual Sinister Six. Even disregarding that though, the movie was less about the villains and more about Peter dealing with the role of Spider-Man as it infects his personal life on every level. Basically, the plot of the original Spider-Man 2 XDD. On a superficial level, the action sequences were REALLY well done in my opinion. Marc Webb continues to capture the essence of Spider-Man in battle better than the originals did in my opinion. I don't know, maybe I'm simple-minded or something. 

On a side note, I gotta say Halo, you're an intriguing person to talk to XD.