[quote=Coga19000]
Why not? They are all adjascent, balkanic countries just make sense to be together, and all of them are at the Mediterrenean Sea. What exactly is bothering you with such a combination?Or maybe, could you tell me a combination that sounds better for you?
[/quote]

Just because two nations are in the vaguely same area does not mean that they are complimentary to each other. As a solid basis: all those states have incredibly divergent histories from each other and hugely different cultures (the Balkans are Slavic ethnically, and the Greeks are not Romantically influenced). And good relations between nations does not equal reason for annexation or binding up into one mega-state. Nationalism would see to its destruction at conception.

Not to mention these nations already having been stated as not being democratic (in Italy's case) and them being claimed already (Greece, a goodly part of the Balkans/if not already something to refer to Helix over) already makes your super-state unacceptable.

Also, two aircraft carriers? Nigga you cray, none of any of those nations have the capabilities to build those - especially in a post-war economy - nor would they have the resources to use them or back national interests beyond the Mediterranean: the whole region is already in jet range anyways.

In closing: go home and try-hard there.

And the only time I can recall any of these nations were one was during the era of [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sicily#Spanish_period]Spanish Sicily[/url] brought on by Spanish inheritance of Sicily. But situations creating personal unions such as this only arises in monarchies, which Spain isn't much of anymore and Italy is not.