[quote=Blondini]
Just a quick question (I'm halfway through reading the info on species, and I'm favouring wisps so far), when you say a photo of a fey can destroy them, does it have to be of the whole fey or just a part. or say, would the glimpse of a wing tip (I guess this goes for seeing as well as photos) destroy the whole fey or just the wing tip as seen? I guess I'm asking- does seeing a small (non-vital) part of a fey destroy the part or the whole thing? Sorry- its not terribly well phrased.
[/quote]

That's a good one. Have you ever played Mage? Familiar with the concept of paradox where if mage casts a spell that is obviously magic then if it is observed by sleepers (aka muggles) the mage suffers a paradox backlash? Same kind of thing here. If the photo can be explained away, if a logical explanation can be offered, then it will not kill the fey and the image will persist, but if it is obviously a fairy then regardless of how much of the fairy is pictured, she and the image would essentially vanish from existence. Granted for it to be so obviously otherworldly it needs to be a picture of more than a wingtip, a streaking blur or a weird fuzzy UFO