[center][img=http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i374/bensundeitestutho/418px-Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Union_between_Sweden_and_Norwaysvg_zps1e764304.png][/center]
[center][b]The Union of Sweden and Norway[/b][/center]

The Treaty of Constantinople surely will have mixed reactions, some may praise it for the good it has done, others may say it has not solved the problem or it has not done enough. While the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway do not have problems with the entire document that was created in Constantinople, we do smell rotten apples mixed in with ripe ones. Namely, Articles V and VII. At this present time, the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway decline to dwell further into our opinion of Article VII because we feel that it is rash to make a statement without fully understanding the consequences of both Article VII and the FFBG's intent on blockading the ports of the United States of America. We will say, however, that this article shows a measure of tactlessness due to our previous statement about our intent to continue trade with the United States.

Article V is a different story. The United Kingdom of Sweden and Norway requests further explanation of the exact territories of Schleswig-Holstein. Does this include the southern border of Denmark? Due to our Pan-Scandinavism, we request that the nation of Denmark be left alone. For how much the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland claims that the United States is a "[n]ation...of tyranny and oppression", if these territories are confiscated from Denmark, such an act would be just as tyrannical and oppressive because Denmark was not involved with the talks. The treaty fails to explain whether this "reclaiming" will only involve diplomatic channel or military force shall be exerted. The United Kingdom of Sweden and Norway humbly asks Europe to respect Denmark's boundaries. We wish this article to be further explained before tensions rise.

[i]-Charles XV, King of Sweden and Norway[/i]

[OOC: reason for edit - forgot to sign Charles name...]