[quote=Too Old 4 This]
@Zordon I like it. Really well done with the geography. My only issues are the following. Worldly is a really more of a skill because it implies learned knowledge so if you want that you should take geography or languages to reflect it. Also attributes should be one word only. Finally knacks must be noncombat skills. I see you want to play more of a battle mage so why don't we have your advantage of battle mage let you take a combat style like a nonmage would. Does that work?I think you may be trying to squeeze a bit too much into one character here. You're a mage, you're an alchemist, you're a merchant, your a worldly traveler, you're an expert staff fighter. Remember these are supposed to be the equivalent to starting characters in origins.
[/quote]

The statements in parenthesis were lamens terms for the Attributes. The attributes themselves are, in fact, one word. Also, "worldly" was [b]not[/b] meant as a skill but more of her outlook on life, due to her background. 

Are you saying being a Battlemage would allow me to change my existing "Knack", retitle it my Combat Style and then give myself another Knack in place of it?

It was not my intention to "squeeze too much into one character". While yes, this is a starting character for Origins, she had a life before Ostagar. I do not think she is [i]too much[/i] or [i]OP[/i] because, while she has an extensive background, her skills and spells are basic, just like everyone else. [b][u]Those[/u][/b] are the skills intended to be her "proficiencies", not everything mentioned in her background.