What matters, Rare, is that you gave it a shot before coming to me. I shall take a look at your present history and see what I can come up with shortly.

But first.

Sandman.
I cannot avoid saying that I had planned (before reading the latest on the page) to state that your organisation gives off a definite vibe of 'Halios but bigger.'

In the interests of impartiality however, I will do a full breakdown of my observations.
Firstly, what makes me believe you used Dervs sheet as a template, is the fact that in exactly the same place, you included a short quote about your companies ideal, where no other sheets have done so and it is not part of the sheet template as outlayed by myself. Many of the underlying concepts are also quite similar, only upsized, thus the vibe of 'Halios but bigger.'

On the other hand.

You expressed well before submitting the sheet proper that you wanted to heavily imply work on the basis of Project Lazarus, and in the pursuit of that idea, the similarities in research field - medical and cybernetic - as well as the inclusion of human testing, are justified in pursuit of this goal.

Let me first explain the idea of using accepted sheets as templates before I make a ruling. This is fine. I often look through at accepted sheets, especially those similar to mine, for what the GM wants, and if its in a layout and format that I like, I will often copy this layout and format for my own sheet. One could even say that this process is a very good thing in sheet building, as basing your presentation off an accepted one is a good way to get your own sheet accepted. The key thing to do when doing this, is to avoid copying the actual idea.

In this particular case, my ruling is that while the sheet is most likely templated off of Dervish, the idea is in fact original. It is however, unfortunately very similar to the idea behind Halios in its execution.

With that ruling known, the course of action is thus: In the interests of avoiding two incredibly similar organisations, Elysium Research Technologies should shift focus to its arms research (or another area entirely if that is preffered). All other aspects may remain the same (pending further unrelated criticism of course).