[quote=Etcetera]
A) A worthless one; it's also possible that I'm blue.B) That would make us fourth dimensional as well. Either way, the point is irrelevant since time has nothing to do with the spacial area of the universe.C) Refer to BD) They aren't tests! Those are equations that we repeat since we don't change our information. What we observe isn't relevant to what actually exists! We can observe nothing in relation to out spacial universe, and have no scientific was of proclaiming anything about it as true or likely. It's just there, and we can only guess. It's not real science, and we can't call it that.
[/quote]

A. I never specified a theory. Just that there was no absolution.
B. If relativity were true, then time would be interwoven with it. And we move in time, thus we move in the fourth dimension, and thus we are four-dimensional.
D. We can only observe. We may be viewing the universe completely wrong (although that's probably unlikely). So in reality, all our science is the science of the observable universe, as in literally the universe and its mechanisms that we observe from our point of view and mind.