Duuude. Chill. It's banter, not an assault. C'mon now, son. If I was to further this argument, in any case, I'd note that my offhand banterous quibblings had nothing to do with proving by fact and everything to do with the perceptions of the world populace and likely impetus by some to prove or 'prove' said perceptions for political purposes. But that'd be silly, because an argument about this point started because of a perceived attack in banter is silly. Plus, Cap'n already pointed out the important bits.