[quote=Magic Magnum]
My only impression is from Spoony's review from it.And from that, I'm not looking forward to 5th edition anymore.I don't care if Spoony is going a big "In the old days!" crazy, some of the stuff he highlighted like "Advantages" are game breakers in itself.
[/quote]

I did indeed watch Spoony's review, and as much as I love Spoony and admire his reviews, I can't say I agree with his approach for 5e - and, fortunately, he even admits he has the more historical lens focused on it rather than the post 3.5e/4e one.

I can't speak for 2e, and even less so for 1e, but 5e seems to have the balance of novelty that came from a plethora of options in 3.5e, and the simplicity of 4e. Even more unusually, they some how boiled down an already simple game (4e) even more and put the perspective much more heavily on roleplaying and less on number crunching. Some elements just work well together, and those that don't aren't soul crushingly bad (90% of true gish builds in 3.5e for example) and it seems to have drifted away from the issues of progression between tiers of content.

It comes down to, I suppose, what you want more of and can put up with. If anything 5e feels like a better successor to 3.5e than 4e does, but isn't as much a incoherent mess as any other updates to 3.5e from my experience.

The only "bad" I've experienced thus far with 5e is how the current modules are still very much the "X, Y, Z" options when it comes to choices, but they're at least more... well, I suppose dynamic than 3.5e ones.