I wasn't comparing the powers, I was illustrating the discrepancy in the level of suspension of disbelief everyone is willing to grant to the various characters and their abilities. 

The article you linked to doesn't debunk Wolff's law, it simply states that the law is not always correct and is too general to include all the variations and causes and results of varies stresses on bone. It's a fact that weightlifters develop stronger bones. It's a fact that astronauts develop weaker bones. Stress on bone has a direct correlation to bone density and durability, but I'm not going to sit down and earn a PHD on the effects of stress on bone just to write a fictional character with superpowers. Everything I write isn't going to be 100% scientifically accurate. Generally, all I'm going to do is look at commonly seen effects of various stresses and stimuli and think "Ok, now how would that general rule affect her after taking her abilities into account?" 

In this case, the stresses of her life thus far combined with her ability to regenerate would lead to the development of bones with a higher resistance to physical stress. That's it. I'm not giving her an adamantium skeleton, just a physical development that reflects both her past and her ability.

Edit: I too, missed Allen's post about this being over. >_< Sorry, man.