Threads are allowed to go on tangents despite what a thread and topic's opening post may be. Why would you think otherwise? Whilst the OP's post may have been decidely extreme and worded poorly, it doesn't matter what that might be if the rest of the thread has evolved into a discussion of other merit. That being criticism of how and what the administration does to run the site. As ASTA replied to you before, Prince, it does not need a new thread when this one suffices perfectly. 

That said, the particular elements that comprise the problems of this site has been mentioned enough times now (but that doesn't stop anyone from being able to post their own thoughts and feelings on the subject because why shouldn't they? If it shows that it's a big enough issue to a great number of people, hopefully some response from the administration can be gained from it). The main problems being: Mahz's general failings to communicate actively enough about what is going on with the site and his reluctance to look and accept help. The only way the discussion can [i]really[/i] progress from here is for him to speak back to everyone and address his thoughts about these issues. Is he going to be more communicative or not? Is he willing to look for assistance with coding the site, or again not? Until these questions are answered, nothing's really gonna change with this site. And I mean, any response to these questions is fine too, if it's forward progression or a continuation of the status quo, or something else entirely, but a definitive answer would at least be great and put this topic and a lot of peoples concerns, for good or bad, to rest.

As far as Jorick goes, [url=http://www.roleplayerguild.com/topics/2572/posts/ooc]he's actually done more to contribute to this site then you might think or care about and most likely have ever done.[/url]