[quote=Keyguyperson]
THIS.Also, Cale Tucker, go read the rules for once. The last two were broken. They say "No emotional breakdowns in the OOC." and "NO HEATED ARGUMENTS IN THE OOC." The latter obviously isn't a bannable offense, as it usually has two offenders at once. If the argument is broken up or ends, then it;s all good. The first is far, far more serious. If someone has a breakdown, then who's to say they won't have another? Who's to say they won't have one in IC?Combined, those rules are a bannable offense. Possibly not perma-bannable, but still bannable. Now, when someone implies that all the other roleplayers are "Doing it wrong" because they're not adhering to what that someone wants, THATS it. Perma-ban. Again, we can hold a vote right now if you want. See who wants Wilson back. I don't have any objection to that vote taking place, nobody will get punished for voting "yes".
[/quote]

None of that would have happened had you actually fixed the problem. It isn't mature to blame someone else for your mistakes. 

Also, if you're going to choose to get rid of Wilson because you don't like his opinion, cool. But unless you're a mod, the most you're voting for is to kick him out. 

If this was actually started by a moderator, which would be sad as only the mods should make the decision, then I vote no to a ban. 
I vote no to a site ban, I am neutral on kicking them from the roleplay