[quote=@Hank]
[quote=@Robeatics]
[quote=@Hank]
[quote=@Robeatics]
[quote=@Hank]

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger. :sun
[/quote]

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.
[/quote]

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.
[/quote]

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.
[/quote]

It's what he's superficially saying but I doubt that it's the true point of the article. Have you read the little author synopsis to the left of the article? I interpreted the whole thing as [i]lancing the dragon[/i] ("making fun of" -- Dutch proverbs are weird) with men trying to prove the patriarchy is superior based on evidence as flimsy as this.
[/quote]

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments.

Jesus, I'm gonna get a headache. This article is to misogyny what Bloodwulf is to 80s ultraviolence.