...

[img]http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000449031/polls_2_61_head_scratch_5456_425875_answer_6_xlarge.jpeg[/img]

Back to Fire Emblem topics!

...

[quote=@PlatinumSkink]As for lords, I will only allow one or two. If two, then you got to be either siblings or come with a dang good explanation for why a prince/ss of a nation other than Grado is currently travelling with the defenders of the Sacred Stone. Remember, politics wouldn’t like that, and you know what bad guys do to nations that cooperate with their enemies. I have, though, left all leaders of nations child-less for this very reason, and only the newly crowned leader of Rausten, Edan, is too young to have a child yet.[/quote]
[quote=@PlatinumSkink]As for lords, I will only allow one or two.[/quote]
[quote=@PlatinumSkink]None yet! XD ... Do note, I won't actually force anyone to play Lord, or actually have a limit on amount of Lords (I mean, there's three in one game), I'll let people play what they want. If that means we have no Lord, then that's entirely fine.[/quote]
[quote=@PlatinumSkink]I won't actually have a limit on amount of Lords[/quote]

... Right, me. The latter applies now, anyway. Until I think we have too many lords, which I might at two or three... If we get any. Haha.