To streamline this. I'm thinking;

100/50/25/600
Win/Draw/Loss/Tournament(I'm thinking total, but could be changed)

I would prefer my wagering idea, but I'm biased. I think it would provide some good incentive like done college betting brackets, or the lottery. Some of you may had other ideas, but in the interest of getting this done and moved forward - I'm fine with 100 points for the first win, 2 for the second, 3 for the third, and so on. Obviously in a bigger tournament they could lead to someone raking in a massive amount of points, which in the future, could lead to a lot of "catch up" but that's a bridge to cross later. 

wagering is still on the table, you can wager any amount of points you have with a minimum of twenty five. Also items for items. Mundane items can easily be regotten through some method, but special items SHOULD not be gotten again, otherwise the wager is pointless. In done.cases people should be able to use wapons they couldn't ordinarily - sort of a "ownership transfers power" type deal. Maybe not always the case, but sshould be the normal. That doesn't mean being able to manipulate fire, if you couldnt before. Any watered items are returned to their proper owner during unranked fights/off site fights. 

Tournaments should be held three-four times in a calender year. Say Jan/April/July/October. Prevents people from hosting quick grab tournaments. All tournaments should be ranked if for points. Perhaps even in them, like WOTW, you can steal a weapon from your opponents. In the vein of the infamous skin thief. Wager arent req.

All matches should have a judge, and should be linked in the upcoming Rank thread. Each post should include participants, judge, wager(if any), link, and Victor. The judges should probably post this with any comments from all participants. If you want to judge, or have a suggestion for judges message me or post here. 

One account per fighter. Any caught using two will, very hopefully be subject to the banhammer.