[quote=@Gowi] By the way, this was what I liked. Always cool to see my characters being noted for being noteworthy enough to be mentioned. Raven, I suggest you halt whatever choice presumptions you have as they are only working against you. Anyway, I guess I should get a new Levitski post going. [/quote] [s]Fair enough. Then I'll discount that point against you.[/s] The like system is imprecise and you knew it. McHaggis' post was about my character being utter rubbish. Your character is mentioned in one word or phrase. And you liked the entire post instead of putting up your own. You're either a liar or you made a serious mistake in expression; either way, you've done something wrong. One thing remains though. You don't seem to mind McHaggis essentially calling what someone had painstaking written utter rubbish (Mary Sues are utter rubbish as far as I know), while you seem to mind the targeted person trying to fend for himself. If through logic and discussion, I'm convinced that the character is rubbish, I would have accepted that. But all I get are a few flimsy scraps of 'arguments' based on words I wrote that could be interpreted in a wide range of ways, and then I was shut up. You put yourself in my shoes. How would you feel if I call Levitski an utter rubbish character? That he's a Gary Stu/Marty Stu? And then when you try to convince me that it isn't, that you'll make sure he won't be, I brush you off and shut you up, saying that I don't care for it anymore, and that your character will remain an utter rubbish heap for as long as I'm alive? It is an attack. And what followed was one person forcing her will onto another. How can that be condoned? When one is attacked, one must defend himself. When one's free will is taken away, one must fight for it. How can that be wrong?