[quote=@Dinh AaronMk]
[@Vanguardian][@tubba]

For the nature of CK2 China wouldn't be applicable. At all. It's not even in the spirit of Crusader Kings 2 since Chinese politics are far, far from European, Indian, Arab, or North African politics for the period.

The sort of feudal rule that was commonplace for the main stage of CK2 just does not exist in China around the time of Charlemagne. The Chinese Empire had been centralized since before the Roman Empire fell apart, with total bureaucratic rule since the Spring and Autumn and Warring States period. There is at that time no feudal rule over China, it's now all individuals picked by their personal skill and merit. And those positions were not served by dynasty. The only dynasty was the Emperor.

China would NOT fit in the feel of Crusader Kings 2. And if you're basing this strictly on the game's mechanics then chances are you're inviting someone to just march on everyone because, "lolnofactionpolitics", "lolnoclashingdynasties".

China would at the start be the massive Imperial government where it can use Viceroyalties from the get go. All the way down to the county level.

China is at its peak at this period. Where the rule of law is literally religion (see: Confucianism, effectively [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalism_(Chinese_philosophy)]Legalism[/url])
[/quote]

Ok, It was just a simple question for the people.