[quote=@Host] That is flawed. Okay, Vegeta. I'm here with my 1.6 thousand on this account. [/quote] Exactly, and we're trying to explain that to him, but he doesn't seem to understand. We hope my latest post explains it clearly, though. [quote]"It is not that possible worlds are real or fake, they are simply possible." The argument falls apart right here. The idea that something is possible does not immediately imply it to be true. If God as a maximally great being is possible in a hypothetical thought experiment, that doesn't mean anything. It just means that he's possible in a hypothetical thought experiment. And so let me explain my final thought process further: If God, because he is maximally great and exists in a possible universe, is therefore necessary and must exist in all possible universes, including ours, I can simply come up with another possible universe where there exists a god that transcends the very idea of maximally great, and also hates everything and wants to destroy it all. Well, now he exists in a possible world, and since he's greater than maximally great, he must be necessary and thus must exist in all possible worlds, and so he would have destroyed our world as well. But I can go one step further and entirely invalidate the premise, by saying that our world is not a possible world. It is the real world. So even if God existed in all possible worlds (which, by the way, He doesn't, because I just imagined a possible world where God does not exist), that doesn't mean he would exist in ours. The fallacy you exhibit is trying to take philosophy that occurs within the mind and make it affect reality. No amount of thought will ever do anything unless you do something with it.[/quote] You just have a million accounts. If you combined them all you would probably have over 9000 times 2 or something.