[quote=@Earnest Evans] This is semantics. According to [@IncredibleBee]'s interpretation of Guts, the Dragonslayer harms magical things. Interpreting that quote as "Dragonslayer can harm magical things only if they can't be hit by mundane weapons" and, beyond that, something like the Dragonslayer would sunder a pickaxe like the one this nameless character has, regardless of whether it's got an enchantment or not. If it's enchanted to be unbreakable by mundane weapons, then logically the "anti-anti-mundane" effect should take effect. [/quote] [quote=@IncredibleBee] That was clearly a fancy way of saying "The sword can hurt magic stuff now." Mundane, nonmagical weapons can't typically hurt ethereal spirits or cut through mana; the Dragonslayer can do and has done both. [/quote] That's not clear at all. It goes beyond the realm of "Well, this can hurt things that would be immune to a plain steel sword" to a conclusion that only makes sense with an unstated assumption of Berserk cosmology, how magic functions interacting with said cosmology, and further implications when tossing random magical effects at people. It's a bit of a jump from being able to cut through something that would ignore a mundane weapon to being able to negate magic spells and cut through enchantments. Most cases, the enchantment's an intrinsic part of the item; if you can't cut the item anyway (because it's supposed to be too tough for that), the enchantment making it tough isn't going to go.