[quote=@Alfhedil]
<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

Better yet, how about we not be a dick, and direct a post full of snark at someone who was offering interaction in the IC through the development of something for someone else's nation? Seriously, what the hell is your problem? Pages back, when I put forth that Eisenkreis put effective AA down through the use of extensive cannon batteries, you put me down and the very idea of it, yet now you are pushing Cyclone to do exactly that promoting it as the idea of cool.
[/quote]It isn't me who causes problems but you.
You appear to cause a scene whenever somebody dares to correct you. Just chill.

Anyways, I know it didn't happen yesterday but at least try to remember what were we talking about.
You said your defense will absolutely bring down any aircraft and I corrected you. Then you started throwing a long rant which had little to do with the topic and almost had the OOC burst up in flames.
I mentioned that if you try to make your AA defense even better you may include something like the late WW2 radar guided rocket.
Huge and needs an entire building on the ground to control but if it's almost a religion for your people to absolutely never let anyone through then maybe they don't mind the expenses.
I never said that WW2 AA defense was anything I don't like. It was a rather unique situation back then and it makes you respect the AA crew and bomber pilots in WW2 to go through such elaborate measures.
Whether you portray this accurately or go with the "Hollywood type" representation, the operation of large groups of AA batteries give you chance for an enjoyable action scene.

Your suggestion to have guided missiles with their own radar would practically change WW2 to Cold War era.
Like I said, you may as well mount laser cannons then or arm your infantry with rayguns. It wouldn't matter after this.
I may have been somewhat harsh but you should do a self check yourself. Whenever you respond back it only aggravates the situation.
If it hurts so much for somebody to disagree with you then just ignore my post and avoid this whole issue.

[quote=@Mihndar]
While I don't condone his sarcasm (which is fairly rude), I would say the only reason he complained about your AA cannons is because you were saying nothing could penetrate them. Now he's arguing for them because AA missiles are OP. A distinction exists.

Now please let this argument rest so we can move forward. Wars belong in the IC.
[/quote]I am fully in support of this.
The GM even said in the first post that he doesn't wish to see any heated arguments in the OOC.