[quote=@Ruby]
GMs can trust that they share expectations of quality and creative direction, making it nice that they even put up any kind of CS at all. I've seen plenty of GMs that don't over the years. 

And you can't cherry pick which players get to do a CS, and which don't. So.
[/quote]

[quote=@BlackSam3091]
<Snipped quote by Ruby>

Maybe so, but like I already said to GG, a GM should best embody the standards they wish their players to meet.  If they want a player to fill out a full CS with six paragraphs of origin story, a cast of supporting characters, and a sample post then I feel it not only fair, but also courteous if they do the same.  After all, the leader most respected is one that shares the hardships of those they wish to lead.  On top of that A lazy GM encourages lazy players.  Fair enough, a player can't emulate a GM in not finishing their CS because then said player just doesn't get to play.  They never get the chance to be lazy.  But if we don't jump that first hurdle, I.E. Completion of CS's, and instead just barrel through it and hope for the best, who's to say we're going to manage to jump any of the hurdles that follows.

Regardless, I was just busting balls.  I can't actually make anyone finish a CS, and as you say GG and Vandy are well within their rights to never finish them.  Doesn't mean I'll stop winding them up about it though.

That and trying to start an OOC revolt.   
[/quote]

With all that said, I'm going to be hammering it out on my CS. As Sam already knows, bios are the bane of my existence, so I'm going to be juggling it out between playing Arkham Knight and writing.

[@Blue Demon], [@Natty], [@Weird Tales], your CS's are accepted. I'm going to be a party pooper and officially make this a full RP. [@Lord Wraith], [@Nightrunner], you're exceptions. Get your CS's up when they're ready.