[quote=@Vash]
<Snipped quote by Mr_pink>

Mate, you can play her now if you want. 

We have ten [b] writer[/b] spots. Not character spots. If you want to play multiple characters, go right ahead. 

[@Caits]
After some deliberation, I wished to ask you to keep an eye out for a better photo. On a professionalism's level, a stock photo isn't exactly awesome. 
[@Inuyasha] after discussing him, a consensus was reached. [s]Clint Eastwood[/s] your sky cowboy is accepted. 
[@leolycan]

After a long discussion, we have several problems with your charrie. 

1: he comes across as Gary stu. This is a big nono. 
2: he comes across as a jack of all trades, master of all. The formula normally is: jack of all trades, master of none. Keep this in mind for the rewrite. 
3: your bio is very vague. Enough so to make us stop and question his position. I doubt a special operations team would take somebody with a "knack' for espionage or moderate physical traits. Please elaborate on this. 

[/quote]

1: Not very clear on this term and what it means... So I have no retort on that one other then to say I'm sorry?
2: He's a tinkerer. He's handy in the form of invention and stealth, with no real outstanding physical strength or prowess to speak of. In range of 1-10: Machines 8, stealh 7, combat and physical strength 4-5. As such, if I wrote his physical strength as being more than it is, I'd be more then happy to change it.
3: I understand that it was vague. Half the reason I contacted you in PM, because even after reading the setting, I wasn't sure if you had fully mapped out the world or if you were looking for the pcs to build it. As such, I could've gone into greater detail, but the CS was merely to give an impression of the character. The reason why said spec-ops took him was they saw an ability that they could refine. So it took him from (respectfully from before): 6-5-3 to his stats now.