[quote=@MelonHead] There's no established posting order and LeeRoy said he was going to be away for two days, so as far as I'm concerned we have been waiting for you. Now we have to wait additional time for your post after LeeRoy eventually gets to it, where-as if you'd done it in the two days he said he wouldn't be posting we could get on with things immediately. Rilla, enforce a post limit or something, three days is going to be too long and drawn out for a 1v1v1v1, I'm going to get fucking bored if I have to wait conceivably nine days for my next post. [/quote]And then I'd be the third in line instead of the fourth. I asked Rilla explicitly that we can decide the posting order regardless the order of our intros. The answer was no. You reap the results here. Also get a life or play other RPs while you are at it. 9 days may be long but that's the worst case scenario. 3 days per person is a fair interval because not everybody focuses all their free time on this. Actually, 3 days is punishingly short if somebody is sudenly away for a week or something along these lines would happen. Some kind of "vacation" option should be included. Yup, you may hate that but this game isn't all about you. We waited for a month or so already. And this option is only a possibility for the worst case. Anyways, if you are so afraid of the delays then just get rid of the rigid posting order. I played in RPs where 5-6 people were fighting each other and there were no teams or such aside from temporarily ganging upon people There was no strict posting order aside from being reasonable and wait until the other combatants post their reactions. This way you get the same 3 day time limit as in other matches as the clock universally ticks for everyone. So instead of a posting order a simple "don't get ahead" kind of restriction would do. All players should have equal number of posts or close to it. But otherwise it shouldn't matter who gets to post first or last. Would this suggestion be acceptable?