[quote=@Ellri] We don't mind people writing about it, but detailed stuff in our opinion should stick to private. Even when you do describe it, there are many ways to go about it. There's the "porn"-like ways of describing the way the normally concealed organs of the involved people interact and what they look like, focusing most of all on that, and then there's the more "natural" way of describing how the individuals get to know each other, not focusing on the point(s) they are joined together. In RPs, we personally think that attempts at reproduction can spice up stories, but that they should be vague. if the involved parties want more detail, they can perhaps write that out offsite or in PM. If others (players or readers) want to see such descriptions, there's always the option of making a small note that said detailed stuff can be made available at request. The reason we feel this way is not really personal feel that such should only be private, but more that we don't want the guild to turn away those who do not desire detailed descriptions of reproductive attempts, like certain types of people and the adsense bots, the latter who at least in part fund the guild's server. Personally we couldn't care much about how detailed people want to get on it. Some things would turn us away, others wouldn't. But the guild's rules are clear because of adsense, so we think that should be stuck to. We've occasionally written stuff that would've been undesirable by adsense, but seeing as they've not been written on the guild (or in the eye of the public for that matter), that matters little. A small [code][url=ooc-post with note's url][sup]*faded to black*[/sup][/url][/code] should be sufficient to refer to non-faded content [/quote] I should clarify that I wasn't meaning if you guys prefer smut onsite or in pms. I was meaning for you guys personally. I know with the google adsense that the site has, the most we can get away with is probably a few rounds of kissing, maybe some groping if worded correctly. Of course, not all of it can be moderated, so there might be some shit that the mods don't see. From what I've seen, however, there are indeed some instances where smut goes undetected. [quote=@tsukune] Second to this. I roleplay to help me develop un-Sueish characters, not to throw them into a mindless sexual bliss. I do not imagine my characters doing any sort of those stuffs with other people's characters, and I ask that you keep your sick fantasies to yourself. Personally I find smut nothing but pure fanservice that serves little to no purpose with moving the plot forward and character growth. There are many ways to portray a possible romantic development between characters without going into excessive skinship. [/quote] I think -- at least the way you were explaining it -- that you personally don't care for it yourself and not because it "adds nothing to the character development/plot". If the rp that people are in call for explicit, raunchy details, then I think it can be justified. For example, maybe a rp that centers around a Bonnie and Clyde duo. The two of them are obviously attracted to danger. As such, they use that as a means to engage in sexual acts. It's within their respective character personalities and so it's justified. Now, I do agree that some smut/sex can come off as purely fanservice-ish. Coming from someone who has been on both sides of this situation, I can attest to that. But I do not think that it should be completely written off as something that "adds nothing to character development/growth". Because, from where I stand, it's simply not true. [quote=@The Mad Hatter]I actually do have a very active sex life IRL. I try to say this without sounding like I'm bragging, but I get laid pretty much every day, sometimes multiple time a day and with a record with my current partner of six times in one day. [/quote] >mentions sex life >says he's not bragging Okay, I was confused there. :lol