[quote=Jester Acharis]
Fair enough on the president then; I saw no mention in the CS of it being there due to alternative history, so I assumed that was not the case. As for the modern numbers, I see you only counted the active frontline personnel, not the active reserves (so it a case of counting strength a different way), as with active reserves taken into account it would still require an added 0. But yeah, long as you know. Going to stop spamming ye guys now.
[/quote]

Yeah when I looked up the size of the forces I thought that adding that number of reservists would be considered over powering until I saw other nations with millions of soldiers. Maybe I should include those?