[quote=@Skallagrim]
[b]Logic dicates, if you cannot logically do something you cannot do it. If you are trying to grapple a robot who is stronger, no matter how eloqently you write, you are not winning that particular part of the conflict. [/b]

It really is not as difficult as you are making it.

You do understand T1 is build on common sense so you aren't breaking any "rules"

[/quote]

This is where my issue with T1 came in, and why I made such a fuss over Vordak's character in the tournament. In terms of pure physical strength and durability his character couldn't be injured by any other from a logical perspective. That might have been balanced out if every character was reliant on magical means of assault instead, but if LeeRoy's character was matched against him for example with only physicality to fall back on he had -literally no physical way at all- of damaging that character. Meanwhile the character's strength allowed it to -logically- break half the bones in Metz or Shin's body with a flick of its wrist. T1 seems at least to put emphasis on the range of actions a character can carry out and how the opponent should react to those, while also seeking to balance the more devastating effects of magic by requiring them to set up a preparation time. Due to this forums preferred character tier being somewhere in the middle ground immense physical characteristics are abound, and a lot of T1 as I've always understood it grows more irrelevant as people shoot bullets round corners and throw cars at each other while blasting magic out their eyeballs.

Ultimately the main issue is fairly obvious, there's a huge range of characters from different universes trying to be meshed together in Arena, and it doesn't provide a good fit, not even T1 does a great job of patching the seams when it comes to a Naruto character a Superhero and a Soldier having a fight, because those characters aren't designed in a world where they would be facing characters from different universes. How do you balance Magic Vs Gun Vs Superhuman Abilities? Not easily, because there's not much of an existing template to consult, those universes are kept separate in most fiction for good reason.  

Also, having two reviewers for future tournaments would be a good idea, it's the established norm in academia in regards to essays and other marked work. However, the significant issue is that subjectivity is abound in power scaling, as Skallagrim mentioned, so both reviewers would need to first come to an arrangement on the system by which they plan to judge.