[quote=@Isotope]
I mean, the V1 was a 1944 weapon and is a bit advanced.

That said, things like the Kettering Bug existed as early as WW1, so there is nothing inherently wrong with cruise weapons.  Which means the controversy here is centered on the propulsion type, or the pulse jet engine.

So all things said, Yylledenwhatever already has very primitive mid/late 1930's level jets which means strapping one of the engines to a bomb can't be that hard.

So given the V-1's flaws were... Numerous...  I don't really see an issue with it, given the highly limited utility. 

It is up to Volyus, of course, just my two cents on the matter.
[/quote]The v1 missiles weren't even really advanced. They were just very primitive suicide robot planes. And by robot I mean the kind of basic automaton which only follows a single program it was planted with just prior to launch. No course corrections or anything. There's a reason why V1 missiles were madly inaccurate.
As for mine I use the guidance beams which German bombers relied on in order to find their targets even at night. You may read about this with the topic of "war of beams" where radio guidance methods were attempted to be countered by British jamming attempts.
And the British were largely successful.
I don't have much evidence but I feel the gyroscope-guided V1 was also sorts of a F-you to the British jammers. That and the end product was quite damn cheap overall which allowed the Germans to pretty much spam them. that and without the need of guidance they could weave away many of the technical barriers at the time which is why V1 could travel that far.
At the time radio guidance was fairly limited an would've required huge stations.