[quote=@Mihndar] As much as I hate to criticize another socialist nation, some of this technology seems too advanced. Your population is rather high, but that's appropriate as long as you're a relatively undeveloped nation. First of all, tilt-rotor aircraft were invented in the 70s or 80s if I recall, and if you have aircraft you should probably only have comparatively few of them, and your tanks appear very modern even if you don't have any death walkers or things like that. [/quote] I understand your comment and I'll use a more scaled back tank design. I really wasn't putting too much stock into the pictures other than just giving a basic idea as to what it looks like. I tend to favor story over stats. Population demographics, Yeah, I was going on a rough medium regarding all the present nations, except the fay because.. Anyway. I'll scale it to around 110mil My reasoning for having a high population is due to my land size and the fact that IRL colonial non-European nations like india already had the United states and Russia beat in population in 1950. Secondly, I am not trying for an america but in 1940 but as an example, it was one of the worlds strongest nations and had only been a colony for around 500 years (well, probably not quite but I'm going by the "in 1492 columbus sailed the ocean blue"). nothing in comparison to the long standing European nations. Is it safe to assume that it didn't take the west until having aircraft to develop colonies? My point is, Is there a reason that a nation could not develop along the way the United states did? being a migrant nation would allow for many ideas to come with them, allowing a modern nation in a decent amount of time. Not as rich in tradition as the existing nations but still modern nonetheless. (with some notable differences of course) In regards to tilt rotors, [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiltrotor[/url] Edit: Hope nothing sounds disrespectful as I mean no disrespect by any of my comments!