[quote=@vancexentan]
You're really going to go throwing stones at me dude? If I remember correctly the GM doesn't want us using pre-made structure decks as there was an example when I was thinking of giving Ben cyber dragons I remember Ammo saying something about not making it the same as The Cyber Revolution deck or something along those lines. I added in Maxx 'c' because I didn't want to just run full on noble knights while still wanting something that helps with their draw power. With Ben's deck it's all or nothing. If he dead hands he's dead. In the first duel it was the only thing he could do to stall until he got lucky and drew his second noble arms equip.
[/quote]

Well not to continue throwing stones, but TBH Ben's deck is one of the ones with the most Archetype exclusive cards. You really can't argue this any which way you go. You have 2 Maxx C as the only non-archetype monster, 5 non-archetype spells, and 5 non-archetype traps. Not to mention 5 archetype extra deck cards, which is to say your entire extra deck is the entire archetype.

So 45 cards total, you have (45-12)/45 Archetypes. so your currently accepted deck is about 73% noble knight.

Compare to my original decklist on page two of this thread, of (45-13)/45 Archtypes which would be less than your 73% and the GM does not accept the deck stating... 

[quote=@Ammokkx]
<Snipped quote by The Grey Dust>

Get rid of a few Prophecy cards and replace them with more generic ones, you've got the whole damn set in there! I pulled this kind of Bullshit before and got through with it somehow, but I'm not letting others do the same. Same with some of the spellbooks. I suggest removing the more powerful, staple cards and leaving the more niche ones. Also get rid of one of the magicians or Empress of Prophecy.

If you've made those changes, post your next version again.
[/quote]

Now if we do an analysis my <73% did include 2 copies of 4 card (the spellbooks), most SD's don't tend to add multiple copies, so I expected this to be trimmed down a bit, although as supporting cards I figured multiple spellbooks would fit the whole idea of a library. 

Yours on the other hand has at least 2 copies of 7 cards (not including the Maxx c), and a playset of Merlin at 3. So you have 9 cards which duplicate your deck over for the purposes of monster variety. So take out the 9 copies from the total count (the denominator of "unique" cards with respect to monsters) to see just how "Archetypical" your deck really is without considering your duplicated swords support.

You get 33/36: 92% Noble Knight monsters after taking out the duplicates or in other words with respect to monsters, this ratio is very similar to the 19/21 ratio of monsters (which becomes 24/26 when adding extra deck which makes it exactly 92%).

Now consider the spells which you have 2 copies of 3 noble arms. So reduce the unique cards by 3 and account for the duplicated Maxx C by subtracting one from the denominator (you also have 90% noble knight spells btw, which falls in line with the other numbers so far).

33 "Total archetype cards" / 32 "unique cards" which can be translated to 21 "Total Unique archetype cards" / 32 "unique cards"

Which when we remove the 5 cards from extra deck from the question, you get 28/27 and 16/27

So your deck is 60% noble knights from the uniqueness aspect of individual card, but over 100% noble knight with to variety.


So yea, the mathematics proves it <_>