[quote=@souleaterfan320]
<Snipped quote by The World>

Yep, it went through.


Anyways. It's not directed towards just you. Heck, its mainly put in place so you, I, and anyone else who may join are protected under it.

Although, it does give beneficial help to the others as well. A bit of a double-edged sword. However, it is fair and just, and I believe it covers all bases.
[/quote]

Again, I know it wasn't intended to be against me, but let's just pull up some stats quick.

Religious discussion: likelihood of involvement 
David - 60/100
Whizz - 60/100
Sven - 30/100
Spirit - 10/100
Soul - 5/100
Dark - 70/100
Tox - 1/100

Heated discussion: likelihood of involvement
David - 70/100
Whizz - 40/100
Sven - 10/100
Spirit - 10/100
Soul - 5/100
Dark - 90/100
Tox - 5/100

Members who are almost identical in views: 3
Members with opposing views: 1
Members who are in between: 3
Members in between most likely to side with the three: 2

Likelihood of instigating religious discussion on any level:
David - 70/100
Whizz - 80/100
Sven - 40/100
Spirit - 5/100
Soul - 20/100
Dark - 75/100
Tox - 5/100

See what I mean about the stacked deck? We've already got a case study for what you're proposing, and it led to me being gone for a year. David, the "next in charge but actually the one in charge by any measurement despite us saying nobody is in charge" decided no more religious talk, didn't follow it, and the 4/5 decided it's fine for that but not for opposing talk (see members viewpoints) and "action was taken," in that I left because I clearly wasn't wanted. I'd rather avoid similar setups, even though it's our natural state.