[quote=@The World] Again, I know it wasn't intended to be against me, but let's just pull up some stats quick. Religious discussion: likelihood of involvement David - 60/100 Whizz - 60/100 Sven - 30/100 Spirit - 10/100 Soul - 5/100 Dark - 70/100 Tox - 1/100 Heated discussion: likelihood of involvement David - 70/100 Whizz - 40/100 Sven - 10/100 Spirit - 10/100 Soul - 5/100 Dark - 90/100 Tox - 5/100 Members who are almost identical in views: 3 Members with opposing views: 1 Members who are in between: 3 Members in between most likely to side with the three: 2 Likelihood of instigating religious discussion on any level: David - 70/100 Whizz - 80/100 Sven - 40/100 Spirit - 5/100 Soul - 20/100 Dark - 75/100 Tox - 5/100 See what I mean about the stacked deck? We've already got a case study for what you're proposing, and it led to me being gone for a year. David, the "next in charge but actually the one in charge by any measurement despite us saying nobody is in charge" decided no more religious talk, didn't follow it, and the 4/5 decided it's fine for that but not for opposing talk (see members viewpoints) and "action was taken," in that I left because I clearly wasn't wanted. I'd rather avoid similar setups, even though it's our natural state. [/quote] i'm just going to comment how I think it's funny that i'm more likely to instigate a religious discussion than to be involved in one [quote=@The World] Mammon machine. Yamder's name for the original generate class. I personally feel we are regulating it, but idk. [/quote] Gotcha.