[@Dazsos]Spells are the most important part of a sheet filled with combat information? Geeze. Guess I should have actually written a sheet. Oh wait, that's right. There is also no real flower text on my sheet. That was you just skimming, like you have been this whole time while [i]somehow[/i] claiming my sheet isn't inclusive enough. I mean, you outright stated that my crystal magic and carbokinesis are the same thing, when they [b]are both listed, and entirely separate.[/b]

I am saying everything that he does is fully capable with what is present on his sheet, and everything he does will be done using what is there. The spells are just not listed because I [b]have no list[/b]. This is something I explained to you from the beginning. 

You are still ascribing your personal definitions to words on my sheet. No matter how you try to talk around it, that is exactly what you're doing. Those words have multiple definitions. That is a fact. Dont believe me? Look at any D&D manual. You [b]cannot[/b] try to forcibly alter the definitions(and therefore scope and effect) of my abilities based on your perception of them or clear lack thereof, or the real reason, convenience. 

You keep saying my spells are 'hidden' when that is a false statement. They aren't hidden, for the last time. I just have no definitive list. How can someone conceivably hide something that was never there in the first polace? I dont know how many times I've repeated something to you explaining it and then you turn around and completely ignore everything that isn't convenient to your argument, and then re-assume your previous argument anyway, despite my explanations.

The judge has also seen our pm's. They are probably far less damaging to me than they are for you. They put on display your constant inability to understand what's going on, even when I explain it plainly to you. They display you applying false, convenient definitions to my magic that are wrong no matter how you try to backdate and argue around it. They finally show you constantly nitpicking just about every single post I've made since we began, changing your reason for complaint every time I alleviate one of your arguing points. I am beginning to see nothing but a serial complainer and whiner.

At this point I'm done with the arguing. I can't possibly explain any more than I already have while maintaining my civility, and being uncivil is very unbecoming. I have broken down his other schools of magic, gave examples of spells in those schiols, and essentially did everything you've asked of me, and you keep digging for more, arguing for more powers after I've [i]already[/i] granted you both your gravity and teleport runes. Two very powerful abilities.

You would strike someone for not having a comprehensive list of spells? That's fair. Know what I'd slap a DM for? Having the audacity to call himself a DM without understanding the most basic principles of character/class archetypes.... Like the schools of magic.